Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Injectable-PRF and Blood Clot in Maturogenesis of Non- Vital Immature Permanent Teeth- A Clinical Study

Main Article Content

Dr. Asha Nara, Dr. Aparna Palekar, Dr. Viddyasagar Mopagar Dr. Sharanpriya Satnoorkar, Dr. Kirti Allappanavar, Dr. T. Chandrasekhar

Abstract

Introduction: The regenerative endodontic procedure (REP) is considered as a viable treatment option for immature teeth with necrotic pulp caused due to trauma.


Aim: A clinical trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy of blood clot and injectable PRF on root maturogenesis of immature permanent teeth.


Materials and Methods: Ten children of 8-13 yrs. age group were included in the study. After access opening, irrigation with 1% sodium hypochlorite and Tri-antibiotic paste was placed in the teeth. After 3 weeks, the cases were divided into two groups with five patients in each. Group I in which blood clot was induced and Group II injectable PRF was placed in the root canal as a scaffold.


Results: Injectable PRF induced greater root lengthening, shortened the healing of soft and hard tissues than blood clot in root maturogenesis.


Conclusion: Injectable PRF was more effective in root maturogenesis of non-vital immature permanent teeth compared to the blood clot.

Article Details

How to Cite
Dr. Sharanpriya Satnoorkar, Dr. Kirti Allappanavar, Dr. T. Chandrasekhar, D. A. N. D. A. P. D. V. M. (2021). Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Injectable-PRF and Blood Clot in Maturogenesis of Non- Vital Immature Permanent Teeth- A Clinical Study. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology, 25(6), 11507–11516. Retrieved from https://www.annalsofrscb.ro/index.php/journal/article/view/7666
Section
Articles